THE COST OF FREEDOM - Civil Liberties, Security and the USA PATRIOT Act

Film: The Cost of Freedom

What is the USA PATRIOT Act?

The USA PATRIOT Act is an acronym that stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. On October 26, 2001, 40 days after terrorists took the lives of nearly 3000 innocent civilians; President Bush signed into law The USA PATRIOT Act.

America responded to the devastating terrorist attacks of 9/11 in many ways. Public support for President Bush's decision to attack Afghanistan and al-Qaeda was overwhelming. The nation came together spiritually in ways not witnessed in more than a generation. The display of patriotism was no longer the domain of military veterans or the politically active; rather, it became a unified cry in defense of American values.
The Bush Administration and Attorney General John Ashcroft argued that the USA PATRIOT Act was both justified, and essential in combating the War on Terrorism. Co-author and Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Policy Viet Dinh stated that "security is the means by which we achieve our fundamental freedoms." Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold, the one dissenting vote, argued that "preserving our freedom is one of the main reasons that we are now engaged in this new war on terrorism. We will lose that war without firing a shot if we sacrifice the liberties of the American people."

Since the passage of the Act debate has continued. Law enforcement officials and the Department of Justice argue that the new laws have protected Americans from further terrorist attacks and the Act simply updated the laws to reflect new technologies and new threats. Civil libertarians argue that the Act has created a surveillance society that dangerously undermines the Bill of Rights. A grassroots movement of citizens also mobilized in opposition to the Act. As of April 2004, four states and 300 cities and counties have passed resolutions against the Act.

The Act is over 300 pages in length and its complexity makes it difficult to easily comprehend the changes it has set in place. The lack of understanding surrounding the Act is reflected in contradictory poll results from the American public. For example, when Americans hear specific provisions of the Act, more than 75% oppose what they believe is an intrusion of this law into their civil liberties. Yet when asked what impact the war on terrorism is having on their own civil liberties, more than 55% say it is "strengthening" or having "no impact" upon their rights. [*See www.retropoll.org]. With many of the Act's clauses due to sunset in 2005, the USA PATRIOT Act will continue to be a subject of debate in the upcoming presidential election.

TO READ THE USA PATRIOT ACT IN ITS ENTIRETY VISIT:
www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT'S POSITION ON THE ACT VISIT:
www.lifeandliberty.gov/index.html

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT OPPOSITION TO THE ACT VISIT:
www.aclu.org
www.bordc.org

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE DOCUMENTARY FILM:
The Cost of Freedom - Civil Liberties, Security and the USA PATRIOT Act

 

 

 

 


© 2008 The Duncan Group
All Rights Reserved & Enforced
No content may-be reproduced
or copied without the written
permission of The Duncan Group